﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Balanced Healing Blog</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:58:09 GMT</pubDate><description /><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:02:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>NON-DRUG TREATMENT AS BENEFICIAL FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/non-drug-treatment-as-beneficial-for-overactive-bladder</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>LARRY ALTSHULER, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study from the <em>Journal of the American Geriatric Association</em> in Dec, 2011, showed that behavioral techniques and exercises to strengthen pelvic floor muscles worked just as well as drugs to correct overactive bladder in men.</p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: These techniques are rarely recommended but should be first line treatment before drugs. Realize that such drugs work in a minority of patients and do have side effects. In addition, acupuncture is probably even better at resolving these symptoms.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/non-drug-treatment-as-beneficial-for-overactive-bladder</guid></item><item><title>MRI BEFORE EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTION?</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/mri-before-epidural-steroid-injection</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>LARRY ALTSHULER, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A study published in the <em>Archives of Internal Medicine</em> in Dec, 2011, purported that MRIs should be done before epidural steroid injections (ESI). Although the overall results of the study were negative, the study suggested a small benefit if ESI was done at a level where an MRI showed a bad disc.</p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: This is ridiculous. The study was negative. This is just an attempt to increase the use of MRI scans unnecessarily. ESI's fail in most people and do not provide long term relief even when they do work, plus there are many other less costly but <strong><em>more effective </em></strong>methods to reduce back and leg pain (ESI's cost about $7500 for 3 injections). In addition, MRI's often show abnormalities that do not correlate with the symptoms.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/mri-before-epidural-steroid-injection</guid></item><item><title>TESTING WITH CONTRAST CAN LEAD TO THYROID DYSFUNCTION</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/testing-with-contrast-can-lead-to-thyroid-dysfunction</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>LARRY ALTSHULER, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A study published in the <em>Archives of Internal Medicine</em> in Jan revealed that, because of the huge increase in testing using iodine-containing contrast (angiography and CT scans mostly), the thyroid gland can be harmed, causing either hypothyroid or hyperthyroid.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: This is important because these tests are increasing steadily and the doctors performing them usually do not warn patients about thyroid dysfunction and most other doctors are unaware of the relationship. If you've had such testing and have developed unexplained symptoms (hair loss, unexpected weight gain/loss, fatigue or hyperactivity) you should have your thyroid tested. (Refer to my book, BOOM or BUST, for further discussion of thyroid testing with reverse T3).</p>
<p> </p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/testing-with-contrast-can-lead-to-thyroid-dysfunction</guid></item><item><title>MORE PEOPLE GETTING KNEE PAIN</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/more-people-getting-knee-pain</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>LARRY ALTSHULER, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A study published in the <em>Annals of Internal Medicine</em> in Dec 2011, revealed that the prevalence of knee pain has significantly increased during the past few decades, but is not related to obesity or age. The authors have no idea what is causing it.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: Knee replacements have increased eightfold in recent decades, but that is because of aging and obesity. Now other people are also getting more symptomatic knee arthritis. It certainly could be due to some environmental factors that have not been recognized as of yet. The important thing is to realize that knee replacements may not be necessary in most patients (and have lots of problems...see past posts) and you should consider treatment with low level energy laser instead (see laser article from home page).</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/more-people-getting-knee-pain</guid></item><item><title>REFERRALS TO SPECIALISTS SKYROCKETING</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/referrals-to-specialists-skyrocketing</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>LARRY ALTSHULER, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>An article in the <em>Archives of Internal Medicine</em> in Jan, 2012, revealed that referrals to specialists from primary care have risen 159% between 1999 and 2009. Most referrals were to cardiologists, gastroenterologists, orthopedists, dermatologists and ENT specialists.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: This is not good. Specialty care increases health care costs, increases waste (Unnecessary and ineffective treatments) and studies have shown that outcomes are actually not as good with specialty care as with primary care. The article and editorials suggested several reasons, one of which was the increasing complexity of patients with multiple disorders. I don't think patients have changed that much over the years...what has changed is the training of doctors and the advent of technology. There has been a persistent devaluation of primary care over the past few decades and physicians in training are not learning the same skills they used to: Now they rely more on technology for answers than common sense and basic histories and physicals. A major problem is that they don't have the time to address each patient issue and also may not get paid for the extra time needed, so it's just easier to refer to a specialist. Finally, more and more patients are feeling empowered and demanding referrals themselves, although they don't realize it may not be in their best interests. All of this bodes poorly for our health care system.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/referrals-to-specialists-skyrocketing</guid></item><item><title>DOES ASPIRIN HELP PREVENT OR TREAT CANCER?</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/does-aspirin-help-prevent-or-treat-cancer</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>LARRY ALTSHULER, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>According to three meta-analyses in the <em>Lancet </em>and <em>Lancet Oncology</em>, taking aspirin regularly is associated with lower risks for cancer, death from cancer and cancer metastasis (the latter especially in colon cancer). All the studies actually were researching the effects of aspirin on cardiovascular disease, but also observed these effects in patients who developed cancer during the trials.</p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: Other researchers caution against drawing definitive conclusions from this data. In the Women's Health Study and the Physician's Health Study, both of which are very large prospective studies, no such findings were found. For this reason, the routine use of aspirin to prevent or treat cancer cannot yet be made. Aspirin also can have side effects of GI bleeding and stomach pain. The data also suggest that the risk is reduced only about 25%. Recommendations at this time is to take aspirin only if you have increased risk factors for colon or esophageal cancer, such as Barrett's esophagus or colon polyps and only if you're between the ages of 55 and 75.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/does-aspirin-help-prevent-or-treat-cancer</guid></item><item><title>NEW DIABETES DRUG A FIRST</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/new-diabetes-drug-a-first</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>LARRY ALTSHULER, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>The FDA has approved the first diabetes drug that can be taken once a week. It is an extended release form of a drug called exenatide (Byetta), which is administered twice daily. It's called Bydureon and is given subcutaneously, just like insulin. It can be used as an adjunct to diet and exercise or can be used with other diabetic drugs. </p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: This is an interesting advance and may be helpful especially in those people who don't like injecting themselves once to several times a day. However, the drug may cause pancreatitis and has the potential risk of causing medullary thyroid cancer. It also may be quite expensive.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/new-diabetes-drug-a-first</guid></item><item><title>DANGERS FROM SLEEPING PILLS!</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/dangers-from-sleeping-pills</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A new study in the journal <em>BMJ Open</em> in February revealed that people who take sleeping pills are four times more likely to die than those who don't take them and also raise the risk for certain cancers, including esophageal, lymphoma, lung, colon and prostate. Other cancers were not increased. Those who took up to 18 doses per year were 3.6 times more likely to die, between 18 and 132 doses more than four times and over 132 doses five times the risk.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: This study is observational only, showing an association between sleeping pills and death/cancer risk, but not a cause-and-effect. Many experts are urging caution in jumping to conclusions, but the data is very strong. There are many good non-medical approches to sleeping that should be tried first and sleep studies&nbsp;should be done if you have excessive daytime sleepiness or abnormal sleep patterns nd treated appropriately. Incidentally, these results included all types of sleeping pills, including antihistamines and benzodiazepines.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/dangers-from-sleeping-pills</guid></item><item><title>NEW DIET PILL RECOMMENDED BY FDA ADVISORS</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/new-diet-pill-recommended-by-fda-advisors</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>FDA advisors have recommended approval of a new diet pill, Qnexa, which is a combination of phentermine and topiramate. If approved, this will be the first new prescription diet pill in 13 years.</p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: Both phentermine and topiramate have been used for weight loss, although both have various side effects. The pill could raise the risk for heart problems and birth defects, so shouldn't be used in pregnant women. Regarding the heart problems, the advisors suggested that the manufacturer should conduct a study for heart problems and wqere split on whether this should be done before or after approval. I peronally think it should be before...what do you think?</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/new-diet-pill-recommended-by-fda-advisors</guid></item><item><title>MORE PROBLEMS WITH HIP REPLACEMENTS</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/more-problems-with-hip-replacements</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>According to an article in <em>BMJ</em>, in collaboration with an investigation by the BBC, it was noted that metal-on-metal hip prostheses can expose patients to toxic metal ions and increase the risks for the prostheses to fail. The investigators revealed that the failure rate is greater than 10%, especially for women and they critcize both the European and American regulatory agencies for approving these devices too quickly and then failing to act in light of the reported harms. </p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: The cobalt-chromium surfaces of the implants can wear down, leading to the release of metallic ions. In a February post, I discussed a study that showed that the new metal-on-metal replacements were no better than the traditional metal-on-polyethylene implants and were more expensive. Unfortunately, 1 million of these have already been placed in Americans. </p>
<p>In addition, as described in my books, with cold laser treatment and/or acupuncture, you may be able to avoid hip replacements altogether.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/more-problems-with-hip-replacements</guid></item><item><title>MORE STATIN SIDE EFFECTS ADDED BY FDA</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/more-statin-side-effects-added-by-fda</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>The FDA announced in early 2012 that it was makig label changes to statin drugs following a comprehensive review. The following were added:</p>
<p>1) Incident diabetes and increased blood sugar are possible with statin use</p>
<p>2) memory Los and confusion are possible although rare and are reversible.</p>
<p>3) Routine monitoring of liver enzymes are no longer erquired, unless indicated by symptoms but should be done before starting statins to rule out liver disease. Serious liver injury is rare and cannot be prevented with routine montioring.</p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: The main risk of which to be aware is diabetes, since this is so prevalent in the U.S. Many diabetics have high cholesterol as well and will need to be on statins, which can increase the blood sugar even more. Muscle pain is still a known side effect, but doesn't usually cause permanent damage unless it leads to rhabdomyolysis...this is rare and is more likely to occur of statins are given with drugs like itraconazole (Sporanox) for fungal and yeast infections or erythromycin (this is pimarily seen with the statin, lovastatin or Mevacor).</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/more-statin-side-effects-added-by-fda</guid></item><item><title>DRUG COSTS MUCH HIGHER IN U.S.</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/drug-costs-much-higher-in-us</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study in <em>Pharmacotherapy</em> in 2012 has shown what we all know: drug costs ae much higher in the U.S. tna in other countries. In this study, it was shown that compared to costs in England, statin drugs (for decerasing cholesterol) cost 400% more in the U.S.</p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: As discussed in my book and videos, statisics reveal that 60% of the world's drug costs are paid by Americans. None of our politicians (including the Affordable Care Act)&nbsp;have yet to to address this problem even though $300 billion a year could be saved by directly negotiating drug costs with manufacturers, as the rest of the world does. Until then, us generics when you can, even though we also pay more for generics than other countries.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/drug-costs-much-higher-in-us</guid></item><item><title>ANTIBIOTICS DON'T HELP SINUSITIS</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/antibiotics-dont-help-sinusitis</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>In a study published in JW Gen Med in January, researchers once again showed that antibiotics do not decease the symptoms of sinusitis any bttter than OTC symptom-relief medications (acetominophen, guafenesin, dxtromethorphan, psuedoephedrine, nasal saline spray).</p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: It is well known that sinusitis is not often caused by bacterial infection and antibiotics do not help. The negative consequences is that you build up a resistance to those antibiotics, which can affect you if you do succumb to later infections. Unfortunately, many patients insist on getting antibiotics and doctors go ahead and prescribe them. The best treatment for sinusitis is aupuncture, which can relieve symptoms quickly and keep them from returning.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/antibiotics-dont-help-sinusitis</guid></item><item><title>BIPHOSPHONATES EXTEND LIFE OF HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENTS</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/biphosphonates-extend-hip-and-knee-replacements</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>In the Dec issue of BMJ, researchers found that those undergoing knee and hip replacements had a significantly lower rate of revision if they took biphosphonates.</p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: Biphosphonates are the primary drugs prescribed for osteoporosis and they help prevent bone loss. Many joint replacements have to be revised because the bone next to the implant wears down, loosening the implant. Revisions are expensive, much less successful and do not last as long. So, it may benefit you taking these drugs after surgery. In other posts, I have recommended strontium over biphosphonates for osteoporosis: I wonder if it would work as well or better since it is cheaper with less side effects.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/biphosphonates-extend-hip-and-knee-replacements</guid></item><item><title>ROBOTIC SURGERY HAS NO ADVANTAGE</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/robotic-surgery-may-not-be-the-best</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study revealed that men with prostate cancer undergoing surgery do not fare any better with robotic surgery than with regular surgery. Although robotic surgery may lead to a shorter hospital stay, there was no difference in important outcomes such as cancer recurrence or long-term side effects like urine leakage (incontinence) and erectile dysfunction. </p>
<p>COMMENT: Robotic surgery has been ballyhooed as being superior to regular surgery with proponents saying there can be better visualization and less blood loss with smaller incisions. However, most of the hype is due to aggressive marketing by hospitals and and the companies who make the devices in order to pay for it: they cost about $1.5 million, not including the cost of surgeon training and annual service contracts. As a result of the cost, the procedure is much more expensive as well.</p>
<p>In an earlier study, men who had the robotic procedure were actually less satisfied in the long run.&nbsp; In the above study, men undergoing robotic surgery were more optimistic than those undergoing traditional surgery, and thought that robotic surgery would have less side effects and they would recover faster. The only difference was getting out of the hospital 8-12 hours sooner.</p>
<p>Many surgeons prefer the regular surgery because they get "tactile feedback", which is important. I have seen a number of patients whose cancers were too far down to be reached by robotics and had quicker recurrence because the cancers weren't adequately visualized and thus not resected. This primarily occurs with inexperienced surgeons, so it is very important that, if you do choose robotic surgery, make sure the surgeon does at least 40-75 procedures a year.</p>
<p>The bottom line, however, is that it is more expensive and does not have any better outcomes. It simply increases the cost of medical care unnecessarily.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/robotic-surgery-may-not-be-the-best</guid></item><item><title>UNNECESSARY STRESS TESTING COMMON AFTER HEART SURGERY</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/unnecessary-stress-testing-common</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A study and commentary in a Nov issue of <em>JAMA </em>revealed that stress testing after coronary bypass grafting was often done despite the fact it is not recommended for patients who have no symptoms. The authors pointed out that the ordering of these tests appeared to be related to those who got paid for performing or interpreting the test.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: This is yet another example of unnecessary testing due to greed. An editorialist correctly points out that in many of these cases, financial incentives affect the quality of care.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/unnecessary-stress-testing-common</guid></item><item><title>NEWER HIP IMPLANTS NO BETTER THAN TRADITIONAL</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/newer-hip-implants-no-better-than-traditional</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>In a study published by <em>BMJ</em>, Nov 2011, a comparison was made among traditional metal-on-polyethylene hip implants versus newer metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic implants. The results showed that revision rates were lower with the traditional implants and there were no advantages to the newer types.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: It is commonly assumed that newer is better and the latest technology has advantages over previous technology. This study disproves that. In fact, the newer implants are more expensive and thus are unnecessary, simply increasing the costs of health care. Unfortunately, they will still be used due to incentives from the company to orthopedic doctors. be sure to ask your doctor what type of implant he will use. Of course, be sure to undergo cold laser treatment first....it may prevent the need for hip replacement in the first place and is significantly cheaper.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/newer-hip-implants-no-better-than-traditional</guid></item><item><title>WHEN SHOULD OSTEOPENIA TESTS BE REPEATED?</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/when-should-osteopenia-tests-be-repeated</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Claudia Altshuler</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study from the <em>NEJM </em>in Jan, 2012 revealed that women who have normal bone mineral density tests or mild osteopenia do not need to repeat the test for 15 years. The study showed that very few of these women developed osteoporosis during that 15 years. For baseline osteopenia, 5 years is an appropriate interval but for advanced osteopenia, 1 year intervals are recommended.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: It is very common for doctors to repeat these tests every 2-3 years, which is unnecessary. As I have mentioned previously, there are many doctors who treat osteopenia, also unnecessary. However, there are other factors that can affect fracture risk and this study did not address those factors. They include cigarette smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, low body mass index (BMI), low dietary calcium intake, vitamin D deficiency, prolonged immobilization, little or no physical activity, visual impairment and frequent falls.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/when-should-osteopenia-tests-be-repeated</guid></item><item><title>COMMERCIAL WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAMS BETTER AND CHEAPER</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/commercial-weight-loss-programs-better-and-cheaper</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>According to a study published in <em>BMJ</em>, Nov 2011, commercial weight loss programs such as Weight Watchers are not only cheaper in the long run but are also more effective than noncommercial programs, such as general practice one-to-one counseling, pharmacy one-to-one counseling and grouped-based dietetics program. It is speculated that these programs are more effective because they provide intensive support and incentives, which sustain motivation and behavioral change.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: These results are similar to other studies in which commercial weight loss programs, including Weight Watchers and Jenny Craig, were superior and cheaper than weight-loss advice and diet medications. In fact, many doctors have concluded that it would be less expensive for insurance to pay for such programs instead of medical care for weight loss.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/commercial-weight-loss-programs-better-and-cheaper</guid></item><item><title>DO BABY BOOMERS NEED SCREENING FOR HEPATITIS C?</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/baby-boomers-need-screening-for-hepatitis-c</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>The CDC has revealed that deaths from Hepatitis C have climbed to over v15,000 a year and baby boomers currewntly account for about three quarters of those who die. The CDC expects that number to increase to 35,000 within 20 years. As a result, the CDC may be recommending a one time HCV (Hepatitis C Virus) screening of all baby boomers, along with their current recommendations for injection-drug users and those who have unexplained elevated liver enzymes.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: Hepatitis C is a slowly progressive disease that may not cause any symptoms until the disease has progressed for years. The main killers of HCV is progression to liver cancer or fibrosis (much like cirrhosis from drinking too much alcohol). Since there are many effective anti-HCV drugs that recently have been approved and are in the pipeline, it is a matter of detecting who has the disease early. HCV testing may be a good idea for all baby boomers.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/baby-boomers-need-screening-for-hepatitis-c</guid></item><item><title>NOT ALL DIETARY FIBERS CAN HELP PREVENT COLORECTAL CANCER</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/not-all-dietary-fibers-can-help-prevent-colorectal-cancer</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>It is well recognized that increasing fiber in your diet not only helps with constipation and colon function, but can also lower the risk for colorectal cancer by diluting fecal carcinogens. However, not all fibers are the same. In a meta-analysis of 25 studies (BMJ, Nov 2011), it was found that only whole grain and cereal fibers were linked with lower risk.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: This is an important study since many people get their fiber mostly from fruits, legumes and vegetables. there is no question that eating those types of foods are beneficial and healthy in many ways and are definitely recommended. However, don't forget the cereals and whole grains!</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/not-all-dietary-fibers-can-help-prevent-colorectal-cancer</guid></item><item><title>MANY DOCTORS NOT FOLLOWING OSTEOPOROSIS GUIDELINES</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/many-doctors-not-following-osteoporosis-guidelines</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A study in <em>Menopause </em>(Oct 2011) revealed that many doctors are not following guidelines for either screening or treating women with osteoporosis. In the study, 41% of women who were screened should not have been screened, 35% of women who should have been prescribed medications did not receive treatment, and 18% of women who did not meet criteria for soseoporosis received therapy anyway.</p>
<p><em><strong>COMMENT</strong></em>: Unfortunately, guidelines for many diseases are often not followed, leading to unnecessary screening and treatment as well as non-treatment when indicated. Screening for osteoporosis should not be initiated until age 65 and women should be considered for treatment only if they have osteoporosis and are at elevated risk, not if they have osteopenia or at low risk.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/many-doctors-not-following-osteoporosis-guidelines</guid></item><item><title>SSRI ANTI-DEPRESSANTS CAN CAUSE INCREASED BLEEDING</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/ssri-anti-depressants-can-cause-increased-bleeding</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study published in the <strong><em>CMAJ</em></strong> (Nov 2011) revealed that patients taking SSRI anti-depressants (such as Paxil, Prozak, Zoloft, Celexa, Lexapro and Effexor) have an increased risk of bleeding if they are also taking blood thinning drugs such as aspirin or clopidogrel (Plavix). Bleeding risk was increased by 50%.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: In patients who are severely depressed, taking an SSRI with anti-platelet blood thinners may have more benefits than risks, but for those mildly or moderately depressed, other agents should be considered instead.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/ssri-anti-depressants-can-cause-increased-bleeding</guid></item><item><title>CHONDROITIN BENEFICIAL FOR HAND ARTHRITIS</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/chondroitin-beneficial-for-hand-arthritis</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">A study published in the journal Arthritis and Rheumatology (Nov, 2011) has shown that chondroitin decreases pain and improves function in patients with osteoarthritis of the hand. Grip sterngth was not improved. The dose was 800 mg daily, consisting of chondroitins 4 and 6 of fish origin.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: Chondroitin is commonly used with glucosamine, the latter which has definitive evidence of benefit on osteoarthritis of extremity joints. Chondroitin alone has been shown not to be effective in arthritis of the hip or knee, but apparently does in the hand. Nevertheless, I recommend using glucosamine either alone or with other additives that appear to work better.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/chondroitin-beneficial-for-hand-arthritis</guid></item><item><title>TAKE BLOOD PRESSURE MEDICATION IN THE EVENING</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/take-blood-pressure-medication-in-the-evening</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent review of 21 studies from the <em>Cochrane Collaboration</em> revealed that taking blood pressure medication in the evening results in mildly lower 24-hour blood pressure readings. Another study in Spain ( <em>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</em>) showed that taking BP medications in the evening in patients with high blood pressure and chronic kidney disease resulted in not only better BP control, but fewer heart attacks and strokes.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: These studies are very important and blood pressure medication should be taken at night. Many people, however, are on twice daily medications, but if taking a single agent and/or long-acting agent once daily, evening doses are better. It should be noted that other drugs, such as statins (and also fish oil) for high cholesterol are more effective when taken at night, primarily because that's when most cholesterol is manufactured in the body.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/take-blood-pressure-medication-in-the-evening</guid></item><item><title>MEDICAL MARIJUANA: BETTER THAN OTHER DRUGS?</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/medical-marijuana-better-than-other-drugs</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>In the states that have legalized marijuana, many people are substituting the substance for other prescription medications, according to a recent anonymous survey. Their reason was that cannabis offers better symptom control with fewer side effects than do prescription drugs. The conditions for which cannabis is most often used (besides in cancer patients) included psychiatric disorders such as bipolar, PTSD, depression, anxiety and insomnia, as well as symptoms of diabetes or arthritis. Half the patients used it for pain relief, including from injuries and migraines, saying it has less addiction potential than opiates. Other uses included carpal tunnel syndrome, multiple sclerosis and for appetite stimulation.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: I recommend cannabis use to many of my cancer patients because it is very effective for controlling nausea, pain, anxiety and stimulating appetite. A "legal" form of marijuana for these purposes is called Marinol (dronabinol), but it may not work as well as actual marijuana. No studies have been performed to see if marijuana helps symptoms of other diseases,. It is interesting to note that patients paid out-of-pocket for the marijuana even if their insurance covered the prescription meds; patient only do that when they get better relief with less side effects.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/medical-marijuana-better-than-other-drugs</guid></item><item><title>NICOTINE PATCHES AND GUM ARE INEFFECTIVE</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/nicotine-patches-and-gum-are-ineffective</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A study in the journal <em>Tobacco Control</em> has proven what most doctors and people already realize: nicotine patches and gum are ineffective in the long run. This study followed 800 smokers after they quit. After 2 years, relapse rates were the same whether people used nicotine replacement or not.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: Several clinical trials have showed that nicotine replacement had better success than in this trial. However, most of those trials were financed by the companies making the products. In the real world, the results are much poorer.</p>
<p>There's no question that smoking is tough to stop. However, there are alternative methods, such as auricular acupuncture (which decreases the desire to smoke) and mind-body methods (such as hypnosis) that addresses the underlying reasons for smoking that are much more successful.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/nicotine-patches-and-gum-are-ineffective</guid></item><item><title>SAW PALMETTO FOUND INEFFECTIVE FOR BPH</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/saw-palmetto-found-ineffective-for-bph</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A new study published in <em>JAMA </em>shows that Saw Palmetto, a common herb used to treat urinary symptoms in BPH, is ineffective when compared to placebo. Previously, many studies and meta-analyses have found it to be effective. This study not only tested the usual dose (320 mg daily), but also much higher doses, up to 960 mg daily.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: Many people swear by Saw Palmetto in decreasing their BPH symptoms, but this study certainly disputes its benefits. You should realize that many products for BPH contain other herbs along with saw Palmetto, such as pygeum and pumpkin seed. Perhaps these combinations work synergistically to improve symptoms. My advice is that, if you decide to take it, take it in combinations and stop taking it if it doesn't work within 1-2 months.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/saw-palmetto-found-ineffective-for-bph</guid></item><item><title>MIGRAINE SUFFERERS: WARNING IF YOU HAVE ATHEROSCLEROSIS</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/migraine-sufferers-warning-if-you-have-atherosclerosis</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>The primary medication for migraine headaches are triptans. However, triptans are not indicated in patients with a history of atherosclerosis (clogged arteries/veins) causing heart problems (such as heart attack), stroke or peripheral vascular diseases, or with uncontrolled hypertension. However, a recent report revealed that 22% of such patients have received a prescription for a triptan.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: Triptans have been available for a long time and are used almost like Tylenol or Advil. If you have atherosclerosis and migraines, be aware that you should not take triptans because they can cause cardiovascular side effects. Better yet, try acupuncture: it is very effective for decreasing or resolving migraines long term so that you don't have to take triptans.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/migraine-sufferers-warning-if-you-have-atherosclerosis</guid></item><item><title>VITAMIN D LEVEL IMPORTANT FOR OSTEOPOROSIS DRUGS TO WORK</title><link>http://balancedhealing.com/vitamin-d-level-important-for-osteoporosis-drugs-to-work</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Altshuler, M.D.</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study performed at Cornell University revealed that post-menopausal women who are being treated for osteoporosis have a five-fold greater response to treatment with biphosphonate drugs (such as Fosamax, Actonel, Boniva, etc) if their blood Vitamin D levels are greater than 33 ng/ml.</p>
<p><strong><em>COMMENT</em></strong>: Vitamin D deficiency is widespread and can be linked to many medical conditions, so it is important to maintain normal levels. However, 33 ng/ml is higher than that recommended by the National Institutes of Health (30 ng/ml). Many authorities recommend levels above 50 ng/ml. This study shows that you must have good Vitamin D levels for the best effect from biphosphonates. No studies have been done regarding vitamin D levels and strontium for osteoporosis (which I recommend over biphosphonates), but it is probably just as important.</p>]]></description><guid>http://balancedhealing.com/vitamin-d-level-important-for-osteoporosis-drugs-to-work</guid></item></channel></rss>
